Introduction
When it comes to staying active and maintaining a healthy lifestyle, walking is one of my favorite forms of exercise. But not all walking is created equal! Two popular types, brisk walking and Nordic walking, often get mixed up, but they have significant differences that can impact your workout experience, health benefits, and even your sense of adventure. I’ll walk you through (pun intended!) what sets them apart and which might be best for you.
1. What Is Brisk Walking?
Brisk walking is basically what it sounds like: walking at a faster pace than your casual stroll, at a speed where you can still hold a conversation, but your heart rate is noticeably elevated. Typically, brisk walking falls between 4 to 6 km/h (2.5 to 3.7 mph). The key is to keep your arms swinging naturally, your stride a bit longer, and your breathing deeper.
I love brisk walking because it doesn’t require special equipment or training. All you really need is a sturdy pair of shoes and the motivation to move. It’s the perfect low-impact workout for improving cardiovascular health, boosting mood, and burning calories. Brisk walking is accessible to almost anyone, and I find it fits seamlessly into my daily routine—be it during lunch breaks or early mornings before work.
2. What Is Nordic Walking?
Now, Nordic walking takes things to another level. Originating in Finland as a summer training activity for cross-country skiers, Nordic walking involves walking with specially designed poles. Yes, poles! This technique engages your entire body: not just your legs, but also your core, arms, shoulders, and even your back. The poles should be planted behind you at an angle as you stride, helping accelerate your pace and propel yourself forward.
When I tried Nordic walking for the first time, I was surprised by how much of a workout it really is. It requires a bit of getting used to—there’s a technique to master—but the result is a far more intense full-body exercise. You might get a few curious glances at your local park, but don’t let that stop you!
3. Main Differences in Technique
The key distinction, plain and simple: brisk walking uses your body weight, while Nordic walking uses both your body and poles. In brisk walking, your arms swing back and forth, but the movement is natural. Nordic walking, in contrast, involves a coordinated push with the poles to maximize forward thrust, demanding more upper body strength and coordination. The result? Nordic walking can burn up to 40% more calories than regular brisk walking, according to several studies.
Another difference lies in posture and engagement. Nordic walking encourages an upright, dynamic posture and engages core muscles with every step. For me, it sometimes feels like a hybrid between walking and cross-country skiing (but without the snow!).
4. Equipment and Accessibility
With brisk walking, the beauty is in its simplicity: no special gear, just comfortable clothes and shoes. Nordic walking, on the other hand, calls for the purchase of a good pair of poles—preferably ones that are adjustable and designed specifically for the sport. Though the initial investment is higher, the health payoff can also be greater if you’re seeking a more challenging, full-body workout.
5. Health Benefits and Who Should Try Them
Both brisk walking and Nordic walking provide cardiovascular and mental health benefits. Brisk walking is excellent for beginners, people with joint concerns, or anyone looking for low-impact activity. Nordic walking raises the stakes—it’s fantastic for those wanting to maximize calorie burn, strengthen their upper body, and challenge coordination.
I see brisk walking as a gateway activity. If you’re ready to up your game or crave variety, give Nordic walking a try. Just remember to learn proper technique, perhaps by joining a class or watching detailed tutorials. In the end, the “best” form of walking is the one you actually enjoy—because sticking with it is what truly matters. So whether you’re striding or striding with poles, you’re already winning in my book!
